Original Article

Urinary Tract Infections Caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa: An 11-Year Retrospective Analysis on Antimicrobial Resistance

10.4274/eamr.galenos.2023.16046

  • Akif Bayyiğit
  • Mustafa Genco Erdem
  • Özge Ünlü
  • Mehmet Demirci

Received Date: 11.08.2023 Accepted Date: 31.08.2023 Eur Arc Med Res 2023;39(3):189-195

Objective:

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are among the most common infections worldwide. Pseudomonas aeruginosa is thought to cause 7% to 10% of UTIs. P. aeruginosa isolates from UTIs frequently show higher levels of antibiotic resistance than E. coli isolates. The aim of this study was to retrospectively determine the antimicrobial susceptibility profile of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains detected as causative agents of UTIs during the 11 years (2009-2019) before the coronavirus disease-19 pandemic and to reveal epidemiologic data.

Methods:

Between January 2009 and October 2019, retrospective data of 540 non-repetitive Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains were included in our study. For the diagnosis of UTI, results of ≥104 CFU/mL in pure culture or ≥104 CFU/mL growths of ≤2 bacterial species were accepted as positive urine culture criteria from midstream urine samples. Identification and antimicrobial resistance were determined using the Vitek 2 Compact System. The 11-year antimicrobial resistance and the three-year Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) data were extracted from the hospital automation system retrospectively.

Results:

Of 540 non-repetitive Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains, 226 (41.8%) were isolated from male patients and 314 (58.2%) from female patients. The mean age of the patients was 66.54±32.62 years. Co-trimoxazole and colistin were found to be the most effective antimicrobials against P. aeruginosa. Piperacillin-tazobactam combination resistance was found to be 52.59%, third-generation ceftazidime, cefoxitin, and ceftriaxone resistance rates were 48.89%, 89.13%, and 60.37%, respectively, and the fourth-generation cefepime resistance rate was 53.7%. The mic50 values of ciprofloxacin and meropenem increased in 2019 compared with 2017.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, although antimicrobial resistance fluctuated over the years, there was an increase pattern in MIC values over the years. An increase in MIC values in the quinolone groups should be monitored for UTI infections. Each hospital’s monitoring of antimicrobial resistance status is critical for infection control and shedding light on reasonable antibiotic use.

Keywords: Psedomonas aeruginosa, urinary tract infections, retrospective analysis, antimicrobial resistance

INTRODUCTION

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are among the most common infections worldwide, with an estimated annual burden of $1.6 billion in the United States alone (1). Uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) is the dominant causative agent, causing approximately 80% of UTIs. The incidence of UTIs is 10% in women and 3% in men in the United States (2). UTIs are also one of the most common illnesses in hospitalized patients, accounting for 20 to 50% of all noncomial infections. In the hospital setting, Pseudomonas aeruginosa is thought to cause 7% to 10% of UTIs (3). P. aeruginosa is a non-fermentative, bacillary Gram-negative opportunistic bacterium (1,3). It can cause infections with poorer prognosis because of its ability to adapt to unfavorable environmental conditions, such as pH and osmolarity of urine, and its ability to develop multidrug resistance (4). P. aeruginosa UTIs are associated with high morbidity and mortality in elderly patients. P. aeruginosa isolates from UTIs frequently show higher levels of antibiotic resistance than E. coli isolates (1,3,5). P. aeruginosa is one of the most important bacteria causing complicated clinical problems (6). Antimicrobial resistance is a significant global health problem. The increasing use of antimicrobials in recent years has made the treatment of infections difficult because of the development of antimicrobial resistance. In addition to the ability of P. aeruginosa to develop antimicrobial resistance, increased antimicrobial use during the COVID-19 pandemic has complicated the treatment of infections (7). The aim of this study was to retrospectively determine the antimicrobial susceptibility profile of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains detected as causative agents of UTIs during the 11 years (2009-2019) before the COVID-19 pandemic and to reveal epidemiologic data.


METHODS

Between January 2009 and October 2019, retrospective data of 540 non-repetitive Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains were included in our study. These Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains were isolated from urine cultures of patients admitted to the internal medicine clinic of a private hospital in İstanbul after suspected UTI. The first positive result among consecutive samples of the same patient was included in the study, and the results of other strains were excluded from the study. Because this study was a retrospective study, there was no need for informed consent. Ethics committee approval was obtained for using retrospective data of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains (Private MedicalPark Fatih Hospital Ethics Committee, application number: 2021-1-1).

For the diagnosis of UTI, results of ≥104 CFU/mL in pure culture or ≥104 CFU/mL growth of ≤2 bacterial species were accepted as positive urine culture criteria (8). Midstream urine samples from individuals with suspected UTIs were collected in a sterile container and delivered to the laboratory within 1 h. The urine sample was incubated on Cystine Lactose Electrolyte Deficient agar (CLED agar, Oxoid Ltd., Thermo Fisher, Heysham, UK) at 37 °C for 18 h using the colony counting method. Lactose-negative and oxidase-positive colonies on CLED agar were isolated on cetrimide agar (Oxoid Ltd., Thermo Fisher, Heysham, UK). Oxidase-positive and cetrimide-positive colonies were considered to be P. aeruginosa. Suspected strains that tested negative for cetrimide were identified using the Vitek 2 Compact System (Biomerieux, Marcy-l’Étoile, France) for confirmation. In addition to colistin, the susceptibilities of antimicrobials were determined using the Vitek 2 Compact System (Biomerieux, Marcy-l’Étoile, France). The broth microdilution method was used to assess colist susceptibility. Antimicrobial susceptibility results were evaluated according to the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute criteria before 2016 and the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) criteria after 2016. P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 was used for quality control in all procedures (9-11). The 11-year data of urine samples evaluated and cultured in the laboratory were retrospectively retrieved from the hospital automation system. In our hospital, MIC ranges were also presented in the results reports of 2017, 2018, and 2019. Therefore, MIC data of antimicrobials were also determined in the data of these years by removing them from the reports. Only descriptive statistical methods were used in this study.


RESULTS

A total of 540 non-repetitive Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains with positive urine cultures for suspected UTIs were included in this study. Of all strains, 226 (41.8%) were isolated from male patients and 314 (58.2%) from female patients. The mean age of the patients was 66.54±32.62 years. The distribution of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains according to years is presented in Table 1.         

When the antibiotic susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains that cause UTIs was analyzed, it was found that co-trimoxazole was the most effective antibiotic, and 94.07% of the strains were susceptible to it. With 90.37%, colistin was the next drug after co-trimoxazole. Cefazolin susceptibility was the lowest at 0.37% (Table 2).

The distribution of antibiotic resistance status of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains found to be causative agents of UTIs according to years is shown in Table 3. Although an increase in the resistance profiles was observed over the years, there was no clear pattern of increase or decrease. As a result, it was determined whether antibiotic resistance increased or decreased over time.

According to the findings of our study, when the antimicrobial resistance of the strains from all years was analyzed, piperacillin resistance among antipseudomonal penicillins was found to be 60.74%, and piperacillin-tazobactam combination resistance was found to be 52.59%. This revealed that piperacillin should be used cautiously in treating infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The 99.63% resistance to cefazolin, a first-generation cephalosporin, and 89.63% resistance to cefoxitin, a second-generation cephalosporin, were also suggestive. Ceftazidime, a third-generation cephalosporin, and cefepime, a fourth-generation cephalosporin, are antimicrobials with antipseudomonal activity. The third-generation ceftazidime, cefoxitin, and ceftaxone resistance rates were 48.89%, 89.13%, and 60.37%, respectively, and the fourth-generation cefepime resistance rate was 53.7%. Meropenem susceptibility was studied to reveal resistance to carbapenems, which are recommended as last-line drugs and was found to be 43.7%. Considering all these data, resistance to beta lactam group antibiotics has reached dreadful levels in P. aeruginosa strains in our center. When the resistance to aminoglycosides, which are recommended to be used in combination with beta lactams, was analyzed, netilmicin and tobramycin resistance was found to be 43.33% and 27.78%, respectively. Resistance to quinolones was relatively low, with ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin resistance rates of 30% and 21.11%, respectively. However, only 5.93% of the strains to which co-trimoxazole was the most effective antibiotic were resistant. Co-trimoxazole was followed by colistin with a resistance rate of 9.63% (Table 3). In addition, while the resistance rate to colistin was zero in the first three years of the period examined, this rate increased to 23% in 2019. When the first three and last three years were compared, it was discovered that resistance increased significantly (p<0.05).

According to the findings of our study, when the antimicrobial resistance rates detected in 3-year periods were compared, it was determined that the antimicrobial resistance rates detected for ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, and cefepime among cephalosporins in 2018-2019 did not increase compared with the antimicrobial resistance rates detected between 2008 and 2011. In contrast, the resistance rates of all other cephalosporin antibiotics increased. Furthermore, in the quinolone group of antibiotics, which are frequently used in treating UTIs, the antimicrobial resistance rates of ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin in 2018-2019 showed a slight increase compared with the antimicrobial resistance rates detected between 2008 and 2011.

MIC50 and MIC90 values of 268 P. aeruginosa strain between 2017 and 2019 are presented in Table 4. It was determined that the mic50 value of ciprofloxacin, which is frequently used for treating UTIs, increased in 2019 compared with 2017. For meropenem, it was found that the data of 2019 showed an increase in terms of both MIC50 and MIC90 values compared with the 2017 data. Although there was no clear pattern of increase in resistance rates over the years, there was a pattern of increase in MIC values against P. aeruginosa in most antimicrobials commonly used in UTIs over the years.


DISCUSSION

P. aeruginosa is an important nosocomial infection agent. In addition to its widespread presence in the hospital environment and its potential to grow on various antiseptics, antimicrobial resistance in these strains is an important public health problem. It is believed to be responsible for 10% of nosocomial UTIs, and the disease has a poor prognosis in elderly and hospitalized patients. Furthermore, the problem of antimicrobial resistance developing at the origin results in treatment failure and increase morbidity and mortality (3-5). In addition, it is thought that the increased use of antimicrobials during the coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic contributed to antimicrobial resistance and complicated the treatment of infections. Therefore, our study aimed to perform a retrospective analysis of the antimicrobial susceptibility profile of P. aeruginosa strains detected as causative agents of UTIs during the 11 years before the COVID-19 pandemic.

Erdoğan et al. (12) investigated the antimicrobial resistance status of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from Malatya Training and Research Hospital intensive care unit patients between 2016 and 2019. The most effective antibiotics for P. aeruginosa strains were colistin and norfloxacin, whereas the lowest susceptibility among the antibiotics studied was found for aztreonam. Susceptibility rates were 76.5% for amikacin, 8.1% for aztreonam, 74.4% for gentamicin, 62.2% for imipenem, 97.1% for colistin, 57.5% for levofloxacin, 61.4% for meropenem, 57.4% for netilmicin, 89.9% for norfloxacin, and 48% for piperacillin/tazobactam,7%, piperacillin 35.7%, cefepime 57.7%, ceftazidime 62.7%, ciprofloxacin 66%, and tobramycin 80.9%, which were similar to the findings of our study (12). Behçet et al. (13) investigated the antimicrobial resistance status of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University Medical Faculty Hospital between 2015 and2017. The rates of resistance to colistin 6.7%, amikacin 11.6%, gentamicin 19.7%, ceftazidime 21.6%, piperacillin/tazobactam 22.4%, cefepime 24.2%, levofloxacin 25.5%, ciprofloxacin 27.4%, imipenem 31.6%, and meropenem 32.1%. When the resistance increased during the analyzed years, a significant increase was found only in cefepime resistance (13). Between 2017 and 2021, Öner et al. (14) aimed to determine the antimicrobial resistance status of 2876 P. aeruginosa strains isolated from the Pamukkale University Faculty of Medicine between 2017 and 2021. Accordingly, the lowest resistance was found against amikacin (n=88, 3%) and gentamicin (n=174, 6%), whereas the highest resistance was found against ceftazidime (n=602, 21%) and imipenem (n=553, 19%) (14). Notably, the resistance rates found by Behçet et al. (13) and Öner et al. (14) in Bolu and Denizli provinces, respectively, were lower than the findings of our study. This difference may be due to changes in regional treatment regimens. To examine the worldwide P. aeruginosa resistance data, the 1997-2016 data of the SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance program, which includes the Asia-Pacific region, Europe, Latin America, and North America, can be considered. Accordingly, in the 20-year analysis of P. aeruginosa strains, the cefepime resistance rate was reported as 20.7% and the ceftazidime resistance rate as 22.5%. In addition, the piperacillin/tazobactam resistance rate, which is frequently used in empirical treatment in intensive care units, was found to be 26.8% (15). Considering these findings, it is noteworthy that the resistance to the relevant antibiotics was twice as high in our strains, suggesting that we are inadequate in rational antibiotic use.

The Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines recognize nitrofurantoin and co-trimoxazole as the current standard of care for uncomplicated UTIs in women. However, all guidelines state that local or regional antimicrobial susceptibility patterns should be considered (16). Kalal and Nagaraj (16) reported in their study in India that aminopenicillins, ciprofloxacin, and co-trimoxazole may not be appropriate options for the empirical treatment of UTI. They reported that P. aeruginosa was resistant to most antibiotics and had a higher level of antibiotic resistance. They emphasized that antibiotic resistance may cause increased morbidity, mortality, cost, and hospital stay because carbapenems are the last line of defense against resistant gram-negative infections (16). Similarly, our data suggest that aminopenicillins, ciprofloxacin, and co-trimoxazole can be used for the empirical treatment of UTI. Jombo et al. (17) found that 92% of the P. aeruginosa strains in UTIs in Nigeria were sensitive to ciprofloxacin and 86% were sensitive to cecuroxime. However, all strains were resistant to nitrofurantoin (17). While high resistance to nitrofurantoin was similarly found in our study, our quinolone resistance rates were lower than those in this study. Perween et al. (18) reported a resistance rate of 42.3% for ciprofloxacin, 57.7% for cefepime, 64.3% for ceftazidime, 42.3% for piperacillin-tazobactam, 29.6% for meropenem, 7.4% for colistin, and 50% for nitrofurantoin because of their study analyzing UTI agents in children in India. It was observed that our data were similar to the data of this study, except for nitrofurantoin. Al Mamari et al. (19) observed a decreasing trend of resistance to most antibiotics except imipenem in 47 P. aeruginosa strains in 2018 compared with that in 2013. According to the data of our study, a similar decrease or increase in resistance patterns was not detected. Following COVID-19, quinolone and cephalosporin resistance increased significantly, particularly in nosocomial infection agents with high resistance development capabilities, such as P. aeruginosa, with lengthening of hospitalization and an increase in empirical treatments (20). In 2020 and 2022, a study conducted in Iran similarly reported an increase in antimicrobial resistance in P. aeruginosa strains, and researchers emphasized the importance of monitoring these data for global public health (21). Er et al. (22) reported in Turkey that the highest resistance rates were found against ceftazidime (85.4%) and piperecillin/tazobactam (86.6%) between 2008 and 2012, P. aeruginosa strains isolated from hospitalized patients with UTI. In this study, it is interesting to report that strains isolated from UTI had a similar resistance pattern to blood cultures (22). It was observed that the data of our study were similar. Sader et al. (23) reported that antimicrobial resistance rates of P. aeruginosa strains followed up in the USA between 2012 and 2015 were stable, and it was recommended that antimicrobial combination therapies should be selected for empirical treatment. Yayan et al. (24) reported that the antimicrobial resistance pattern of P. aeruginosa strains fluctuated over a 10-year period, similar to our study.

Study Limitations

The limitations of our study were that it was a single-center study and did not differentiate UTIs as complicated or uncomplicated. However, it is valuable in containing 11 years of epidemiological data from the pre-COVID-19 period and revealing the epidemiologic antimicrobial resistance pattern.


CONCLUSION

Antimicrobial resistance in P. aeruginosa strains is an important public health problem. Our study included patients admitted to a private hospital in İstanbul and revealed the resistance status of all strains isolated over an 11-year period. Accordingly, we believe that resistance is critically high in İstanbul, and empirical treatment should be planned according to the relevant results. Although antimicrobial resistance fluctuated over the years, there was an increase pattern in MIC values over the years. Each hospital’s monitoring of antimicrobial resistance status is critical for infection control and shedding light on reasonable antibiotic use. In addition, we believe that these data will contribute to taking effective measures against the problem of antimicrobial resistance by showing the antimicrobial resistance rates that may be detected after COVID-19. We believe that antimicrobial resistance may have increased because of the widespread use of quinolones and cephalosporins in the COVID-19 pandemic. Studies similar to this study should be conducted during the pandemic period.

Ethics

Ethics Committee Approval: Ethics committee approval was obtained for using retrospective data of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains (Private MedicalPark Fatih Hospital Ethics Committee, application number: 2021-1-1).

Informed Consent: Retrospective study.

Peer-review: Externally peer reviewed.

Authorship Contributions

Surgical and Medical Practices: M.G.E., Concept: Ö.Ü., M.D., Design: A.B., M.D., Data Collection or Processing: A.B., M.G.E., Ö.Ü., Analysis or Interpretation: Ö.Ü., Literature Search: A.B., M.G.E., Writing: A.B., M.D.

Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.

Financial Disclosure: The authors declared that this study received no financial support.


Images

  1. Newman JN, Floyd RV, Fothergill JL. Invasion and diversity in Pseudomonas aeruginosa urinary tract infections. J Med Microbiol 2022;71:001458.
  2. Klein RD, Hultgren SJ. Urinary tract infections: microbial pathogenesis, host-pathogen interactions and new treatment strategies. Nat Rev Microbiol 2020;18:211-26
  3. Lamas Ferreiro JL, Álvarez Otero J, González González L, Novoa Lamazares L, Arca Blanco A, Bermúdez Sanjurjo JR, et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa urinary tract infections in hospitalized patients: Mortality and prognostic factors. PLoS One 2017;12:e0178178
  4. Paz-Zarza VM, Mangwani-Mordani S, Martínez-Maldonado A, Álvarez-Hernández D, Solano-Gálvez SG, Vázquez-López R. Pseudomonas aeruginosa: patogenicidad y resistencia antimicrobiana en la infección urinaria [Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Pathogenicity and antimicrobial resistance in urinary tract infection]. Rev Chilena Infectol 2019;36:180-9.
  5. Ironmonger D, Edeghere O, Bains A, Loy R, Woodford N, Hawkey PM. Surveillance of antibiotic susceptibility of urinary tract pathogens for a population of 5.6 million over 4 years. J Antimicrob Chemother 2015;70:1744-50.
  6. Estaji M, Tabasi M, Sadeghpour Heravi F, Kheirvari Khezerloo J, Radmanesh A, Raheb J, et al. Genotypic identification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from patients with urinary tract infection. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis 2019;65:23-8.
  7. Mena Lora AJ, Sorondo C, Billini B, Gonzalez P, Bleasdale SC. Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa before and after the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in the Dominican Republic. Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol 2022;2:e191.
  8. LaRocco MT, Franek J, Leibach EK, Weissfeld AS, Kraft CS, Sautter RL, et al. Effectiveness of Preanalytic Practices on Contamination and Diagnostic Accuracy of Urine Cultures: a Laboratory Medicine Best Practices Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin Microbiol Rev 2016;29:105-47.
  9. Coşeriu RL, Vintilă C, Mare AD, Ciurea CN, Togănel RO, Cighir A, et al. Epidemiology, Evolution of Antimicrobial Profile and Genomic Fingerprints of Pseudomonas aeruginosa before and during COVID-19: Transition from Resistance to Susceptibility. Life (Basel) 2022;12:2049.
  10. Ahmed SS, Shariq A, Alsalloom AA, Babikir IH, Alhomoud BN. Uropathogens and their antimicrobial resistance patterns: Relationship with urinary tract infections. Int J Health Sci (Qassim) 2019;13:48-55.
  11. Unlu O, Ersoz BR, Istanbullu Tosun A, Demirci M. Epidemic Klebsiella pneumoniae ST258 incidence in ICU patients admitted to a university hospital in Istanbul. J Infect Dev Ctries 2021;15:665-71.
  12. Erdoğan MM, Acun Delen L, Erdoğan E. Antibiotic Susceptibilities of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strains Isolated from Intensive Care Units. Journal of İnönü University Vocational School of Health Services 2021;9:230-7.
  13. Behçet M, Avcıoğlu F, Karabök Ş, Kurtoglu M. Antimicrobial Resistance Rates of ID Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strains Isolated from Various Clinical Specimens: A Three-Year Evaluation. ANKEM Journal 2019;33:43-8.
  14. Öner SZ, Kaleli İ, Demir M, Mete E, Çalışkan A, Ergin Ç. Antibiotic resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates and its change over the years. ANKEM Derg 2022;36:9-15.
  15. Shortridge D, Gales AC, Streit JM, Huband MD, Tsakris A, Jones RN. Geographic and Temporal Patterns of Antimicrobial Resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Over 20 Years From the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, 1997-2016. Open Forum Infect Dis 2019;6:S63-8.
  16. Kalal BS, Nagaraj S. Urinary tract infections: a retrospective, descriptive study of causative organisms and antimicrobial pattern of samples received for culture, from a tertiary care setting. Germs 2016;6:132-8.
  17. Jombo GT, Jonah P, Ayeni JA. Multiple resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in contemporary medical practice: findings from urinary isolates at a Nigerian University Teaching Hospital. Niger J Physiol Sci 2008;23:105-9.
  18. Perween N, Rai S, Nandwani S, Kumar SK. Retrospective Analysis of Urinary Tract Infection in the Pediatric Population at a Tertiary Care Centre. Cureus 2022;14:e24796.
  19. Al Mamari Y, Sami H, Siddiqui K, Tahir HB, Al Jabri Z, Al Muharrmi Z, et al. Trends of antimicrobial resistance in patients with complicated urinary tract infection: Suggested empirical therapy and lessons learned from a retrospective observational study in Oman. Urol Ann 2022;14:345-52.
  20. Bahçe YG, Acer Ö, Özüdoğru O. Evaluation of bacterial agents isolated from endotracheal aspirate cultures of Covid-19 general intensive care patients and their antibiotic resistance profiles compared to pre-pandemic conditions. Microb Pathog 2022;164:105409.
  21. Khoshbakht R, Kabiri M, Neshani A, Khaksari MN, Sadrzadeh SM, Mousavi SM, et al. Assessment of antibiotic resistance changes during the Covid-19 pandemic in northeast of Iran during 2020-2022: an epidemiological study. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2022;11:121.
  22. Er H., Şen M., Altındiş M. İdrar yolu enfeksiyonlarından izole edilen Pseudomonas Aeruginosa’larda antibiyotik direnci. Turkish Journal of Clinics and Laboratory 2015;6:80-4.
  23. Sader HS, Huband MD, Castanheira M, Flamm RK. Pseudomonas aeruginosa Antimicrobial Susceptibility Results from Four Years (2012 to 2015) of the International Network for Optimal Resistance Monitoring Program in the United States. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2017;61:e02252-16.
  24. Yayan J, Ghebremedhin B, Rasche K. Antibiotic Resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Pneumonia at a Single University Hospital Center in Germany over a 10-Year Period. PLoS One 2015;10:e0139836.